Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12
Also a pretty clear trend with the "Big 3" of Ont, Que, and BC.
|
The fidelity in that graph is pretty low, but when I go to the table behind the numbers, for BC the GHG emissions on 2005 were 63.1 Mt and for 2017 they were
64.5 MT. So why is that BC is so negligent in meeting it's targets and actually increased it's GHG emissions??
The currently active
Climate Change Accountability Act states that BC has a goal of "33% decrease by 2020" against 2007 numbers (which were the same as the 2005 numbers) meaning that next year, BC's GHG emission target is roughly 40 MT.
Given that there will be massive increases in GHG emissions in coming years due to LNG, it seems like BC is the worst of creatures out there - a place that says great things but fails to deliver on them, and yet chastises others for doing the exact same thing.
Perhaps you and the rest of BC (myself included) should take your advice first before preaching to others.