HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #821  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2014, 12:21 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Noticed this on 27th just south of Lynn Valley Centre and west of Canyon Springs at some rundown townhouse rentals called Mountain Court.

5 storey proposal south of Lynn Valley Centre by chrisjohann, on Flickr

Another five storey wood frame "North Vancouver special" from Polygon, but should compliment everything else going on in the area.

Canyon Springs should be above ground soon, while we're on the topic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #822  
Old Posted Jun 30, 2014, 3:54 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #823  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2014, 2:05 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Prescott from a different angle. Because why not

Blue Shore, North Vancouver by chrisjohann, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #824  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2014, 4:27 PM
wrenegade's Avatar
wrenegade wrenegade is offline
ON3P Skis
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lower Lonsdale, North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,593
Great shot. The Prescott turned out quite nicely.
__________________
Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #825  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 12:36 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Park Royal towers get sent to the next phase

West Vancouver mulls Park Royal towers
Proposal proceeds for more public consult


Quote:
While the proposed Park Royal highrises were heralded as an opportunity to bring in affordable housing for disabled people, the mall itself was also called out as being a bad neighbour at the District of West Vancouver's Monday night council meeting.

The shopping centre's proposed two towers of 24 and 17 storeys above a two storey commercial podium at 752 Marine Drive could include more than a few hundred residential units, office space, a village square and storefronts. It may also provide the Vancouver Resources Society, a nonprofit that provides services for the physically disabled, 10 accessible units for those with a disability or mobility issues.

Chris Kirby, member of the society's housing advisory committee, has lived with his wheelchair for the last 22 years when he had an accident the day before Christmas. He told council the 10 units would go a long way to make an otherwise expensive neighbourhood more accessible for people like him.

"Being able to live in this community is huge for people with disabilities," he said. "The other option is an institution. I have friends who live in these circumstances, and it's not pretty. Living in the community allows people with a disability to participate in life, instead of watching it go by."

Kirby, who has friends and family living on the North Shore, said living in the Park Royal highrises would put himself within reasonable distance of grocery stores, shops and employment opportunities.

"It certainly makes a huge impact to accessibility of an entire community and a person with a disability, such as myself," he added.

On Monday night, council was updated on the status of the proposed towers that may take over the former White Spot location. Andrew Browne, senior community planner, told council following a staff review and obtaining preliminary public comments, the project was found as favourable overall.

Through a series of open houses, information sessions and a virtual open house since last year, about 40 to 50 per cent of those polled supported the proposal. About 15 to 20 per cent were unsupportive, while the rest were balanced with pros and cons.

"What was heard was an interesting mix," Browne said. "There was a lack of detail in comments about anything beyond traffic. Traffic was really drowning out everything else. Clearly, traffic is an issue."

Despite the possibility of adding another bus stop near the site, Barbara Brink, member of the ad hoc committee at West Royal, said there's been a lack of recognition that the Taylor Way and Marine Drive intersection is "all too often a nightmare for all vehicles coming on the North Shore."

"We're not opposed to the two-tower concept at all," she told council. "Yes, there's lots of major centres across the Lower Mainland: Surrey, Metrotown and Oakridge. All of these have residential (units), all have commercial (proponents), but they also have two things we do not have - access ... and also major transit."

Brink pointed out that last year, council had aimed to secure at least 2,000 people through the initial consultation process and have at least 700 responses. However, the district fell significantly short of its goal with only 88 comment forms submitted by the public.

It also did not include the 800-signature petition calling for the resolution of traffic congestion at Marine and Taylor Way, Brink noted. She said 90 per cent of the petition's signatures are from West Vancouver residents.

Council also heard from Arash Atash, who has lived across from Park Royal for the last 14 years. He said when Park Royal was undergoing expansion at the end of last year, there was construction activity through the day and night for three months. He complained to the district, the mall and the police, but to no avail.

"When it comes to noise issues and respecting neighbours' peace, Park Royal is probably the worst neighbour one can ask for," he added.

While council did not put its rubberstamp of approval on the proposal yet, it advanced the application to move forward and allowed the next steps to occur, which include public consultation, a more in-depth staff report on potential OCP amendments and development level drawings.

Coun. Nora Gambioli said the district must be cautious in moving forward because the public wants something of reasonable scale. She noted that more must be done to consult local residents as well.

Coun. Craig Cameron echoed Gambioli's concerns, and said it's still a grey area regarding how much density should be allowed for this development.
- See more at: http://www.nsnews.com/news/west-vanc....UdjmkgpX.dpuf

I thought this was reserve land, but I guess not?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #826  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 5:01 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #827  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 5:04 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #828  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 5:08 AM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 786
It's a convenient little triangle of land on the southwest corner of Taylor Way and Marine where the towers will be. The rest of the South Mall expansion is indeed on FN land.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #829  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 5:33 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #830  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 5:13 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #831  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 5:15 PM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #832  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2014, 11:54 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,809
I guess they aren't oval anymore...

Quote:
West Vancouver mulls Park Royal towers
Proposal proceeds for more public consult
Stefania Seccia / North Shore News
July 9, 2014 12:00 AM

http://www.nsnews.com/news/west-vanc...wers-1.1198938

Quote:
Originally Posted by spm2013 View Post
Well they're nice and round.

http://www.northshoreoutlook.com/news/216818801.html



Credit: North Shore Outlook

Last edited by officedweller; Jul 11, 2014 at 12:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #833  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 1:12 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Heh, the design is so different I didn't even realize it was a render of the new buildings. Doesn't seem like an improvement...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #834  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 1:25 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
Happy to see this update. Oval towers have been done to death in the region, and none of them have improved over the circa-1996 Palisades. Tower on the right in the new rendering looks nice and clean, while the tower on the left looks similar to Elan - one of my favorite designs. Is Merrick the architect for this as well?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #835  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 1:58 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #836  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 2:01 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
The one on the right reminds me of the old ones across the street.


My photo

Oval may be overdone elsewhere but I can't think of one on the north shore besides that newer senior building on Marine in West Van.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spm2013 View Post
Here's where the future condos are headed (D)



Credit: http://westvancouver.ca/sites/defaul...uly07-16-2.pdf
Who is responsible for that bridge at the southern end of the river? It badly needs an upgrade, especially if condos are coming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #837  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 2:23 AM
spm2013 spm2013 is offline
More Towers
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,312
...

Last edited by spm2013; Nov 16, 2014 at 7:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #838  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 3:14 AM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 786
Area D is very intriguing - 'future high density housing' eh? It's on reserve land, so I guess it's happening!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #839  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 7:31 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Is there a reason why the natives don't seem to want to touch the area south of A? I know you don't want to get too close to the tracks and it's a bit swampy there but that didn't stop them from their little development boom to the east.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #840  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2014, 11:25 AM
Joat's Avatar
Joat Joat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 226
I imagine West Vancouverites would be up in arms if they developed the dog walk park. Id join them in their outrage if they touched the pitch and putt. I had heard rumours that that could happen but hopefully there's nothing to them. Assuming the land could be developed, I imagine most people would have less qualms about getting rid of the pitch and putt. That location would be a lot more desirable anyway. I guess they could develop all of it but I could see them keeping at least some of the dog park to appease everyone.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:24 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.