HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2841  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2014, 6:04 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,777
Ahah ! je suis déjà monté en haut de cet édifice avec The rock the Motard en 2008 !
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 068 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2842  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2014, 1:18 AM
Dylan Leblanc's Avatar
Dylan Leblanc Dylan Leblanc is offline
Website Manager
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 9,376
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2843  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2014, 1:23 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,777
I've never seen that angle before !
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 068 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2844  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2014, 1:47 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 11,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan Leblanc View Post
Great pic. Victoria lookin good!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2845  
Old Posted Jun 4, 2014, 2:35 AM
Dwils01's Avatar
Dwils01 Dwils01 is offline
Urban Fanactic
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 3,249
I remember that area from the one time I was there. Their downtown has a big city feel to it and it is great for pedestrian. Victoria should be a model for other downtowns of a city that size.

On another note, are they replacing the blue bridge.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2846  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2014, 1:31 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,777
The district of Montcalm where I live is a part of Québec city Skyline (West part)
You can see the city's highest on the extreme left : L'Édifice Marie-Guyart , 126.5 meters, already on a 100 meters hill.
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 068 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2847  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2014, 1:37 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 35,091
June 8, 2014

Video Link














__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2848  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2014, 5:41 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrAnKs View Post
The district of Montcalm where I live is a part of Québec city Skyline (West part)
You can see the city's highest on the extreme left : L'Édifice Marie-Guyart , 126.5 meters, already on a 100 meters hill.
Those little 3-4 storey apartment thingies that Quebec and some parts of Ottawa seem to love bother me for some reason. I don't know why, but they just look wrong.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2849  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 1:57 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,777
What do you prefer ? Bungalows ?!
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 068 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2850  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 4:54 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrAnKs View Post
What do you prefer ? Bungalows ?!
Commie blocks.

Or the walkups more common in the other parts of Ontario which have a lot more units. Apartments with 1 or 2 units a floor just seem awkward to me, and then those Quebec buildings seem to short to have flat roof too. I'm weird, I know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2851  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 11:27 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,777
Very weird but all kind of tastes are welcome
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 068 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2852  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 1:28 PM
NBNYer's Avatar
NBNYer NBNYer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moncton
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
June 8, 2014


[/url]
What's that red and yellow building on the far right? I never really noticed it before. From this angle, it looks like the tallest downtown.

This is a great shot btw
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2853  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 1:39 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 35,091
That's Southcott Hall. It was built in 1964 and is 15 floors (13 + a 2-floor penthouse). It appears to be our 9th-tallest modern building according to SSP. It's actually a 2.3 km drive from 351, the building in the foreground of that shot, and faces Quidi Vidi Lake, not St. John's Habour. Its base is at a higher elevation than those along Harbour Drive in the foreground so it looks taller.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2854  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 1:52 PM
NBNYer's Avatar
NBNYer NBNYer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moncton
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post
That's Southcott Hall. It was built in 1964 and is 15 floors (13 + a 2-floor penthouse). It appears to be our 9th-tallest modern building according to SSP. It's actually a 2.3 km drive from 351, the building in the foreground of that shot, and faces Quidi Vidi Lake, not St. John's Habour. Its base is at a higher elevation than those along Harbour Drive in the foreground so it looks taller.
Thanks! I just checked out the St-John's diagrams. What's the status for those proposed twin residential towers? Tiffany Estates. Any movement there?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2855  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 1:53 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 35,091
They're approved but that's the last I've heard. It's part of a development that's already half-finished and has been very successful, though, so I imagine they'll go ahead. There's an angle on the Southside Hills from which they will be visible and with a zoom lens it'll look like they're right downtown too, same as Southcott.

Any idea how to get the diagram to show non-towers? It used to show all the churches, etc. St. Patrick's is the third-tallest building in the city to this day. So it's hard to rank an order without all of the heritage ones.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2856  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 2:57 PM
NBNYer's Avatar
NBNYer NBNYer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Moncton
Posts: 1,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by SignalHillHiker View Post

Any idea how to get the diagram to show non-towers? It used to show all the churches, etc. St. Patrick's is the third-tallest building in the city to this day. So it's hard to rank an order without all of the heritage ones.
You can check all the boxes for all building types bellow the diagrams. I did it and it doesn't seem to show St-Patrick's, like there's no diagram for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2857  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 2:59 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 35,091
Weird. I could just be mis-remembering, but I could've sworn it was there.
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2858  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2014, 4:28 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrAnKs View Post
Very weird but all kind of tastes are welcome
Probably because I didn't grow up with them and they're very distinctive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2859  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 5:11 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2860  
Old Posted Jun 11, 2014, 11:54 AM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,777
Fort McNuggets Murray ?
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 068 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:31 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.