HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2401  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 2:47 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,221
High-rises up Cypress Mountain make no sense. I know that there are few midrises already but this looks bad.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2402  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 8:01 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,392
Highrises are actually a good thing here because in exchange for the extra density the western lands are being preserved.


https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/cypr...fic-properties

I'm also not in favour of mountain clearcuts either but the forest that is being removed is second growth. The trees are all the same height with no life under the canopy in the darkness. Directly west of the site in Cypress Falls Park there are legitimate stands of old growth. The largest trees I've ever seen anywhere near Vancouver. There is also significant old growth further west near Whyte Lake. Thankfully these areas are already protected and won't be impacted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2403  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 8:12 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,420
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy? View Post
Great photos and many thanks. I want this design and site layout everywhere in ferry terminal bays.
Yes I agree. More of these around the Horseshoe Bay terminal slopes will make it look like an exotic Mediterranean town of sorts. Quite an adventure to wind one's way up slopes through narrow walkways, stairs and alleys, with small plazas and vistas along the way to view the bay and waters. Little quaint shops and restaurants/cafes should be included all over.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2404  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 8:47 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Highrises are actually a good thing here because in exchange for the extra density the western lands are being preserved.


https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/cypr...fic-properties

I'm also not in favour of mountain clearcuts either but the forest that is being removed is second growth. The trees are all the same height with no life under the canopy in the darkness. Directly west of the site in Cypress Falls Park there are legitimate stands of old growth. The largest trees I've ever seen anywhere near Vancouver. There is also significant old growth further west near Whyte Lake. Thankfully these areas are already protected and won't be impacted.
If they were smart the developers would have installed a gondola to service the area BEFORE the residents moved in
(or West Vancouver should have required it).
Remember that the Grosvenors privately built the Lions Gate Bridge to service the British Properties.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2405  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 8:51 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,970
No kidding. If West Van thinks traffic is bad now, 7k new captive drivers are definitely not going to help things.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2406  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 8:56 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
If they were smart the developers would have installed a gondola to service the area BEFORE the residents moved in
(or West Vancouver should have required it).
Remember that the Grosvenors privately built the Lions Gate Bridge to service the British Properties.
BP will operate a private bus service until Translink ever decides to route a bus here. And the Upper Levels plan envisioned a highway bus route that might make sense here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2407  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 9:17 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,809
I think I remember some rendering of Cypress Village with gondolas, but they were dropped.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2408  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 9:56 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
I think I remember some rendering of Cypress Village with gondolas, but they were dropped.
I think that was Henson's plan.





https://www.urbanyvr.com/wentworth-l...est-vancouver/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2409  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 9:57 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
BP will operate a private bus service until Translink ever decides to route a bus here. And the Upper Levels plan envisioned a highway bus route that might make sense here.
I can't imagine Cypress would be any friendlier to buses than SFU is. Sure, they could do a gondola, but now we're talking about development-oriented transit when it should be the other way around.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2410  
Old Posted May 11, 2022, 10:18 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Thanks.
A lot farther to the east.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2411  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 4:46 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
No different than any of the development around Coquitlam. They are protecting the western portions of the land in exchange for higher density around the proposed development. And there's no single family homes either while also adding some commercial which the area needs.
Density is only useful if it can be served by transit, which is impossible here. I agree it's just as bad in Coquitlam, but West Van is the money shot from downtown! One acre here is worth ten in the Northeast

I would love for West Van to have a series of gondolas running down to a rapid transit line along Marine Drive, with all the gridded streets densified with 6-12 storey small towers (keeping all the mature trees), and Henson-plan-like clusters around the gondola stops further up where the mega homes currently are... one can always dream right
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2412  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 5:15 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Density is only useful if it can be served by transit, which is impossible here. I agree it's just as bad in Coquitlam, but West Van is the money shot from downtown! One acre here is worth ten in the Northeast

I would love for West Van to have a series of gondolas running down to a rapid transit line along Marine Drive, with all the gridded streets densified with 6-12 storey small towers (keeping all the mature trees), and Henson-plan-like clusters around the gondola stops further up where the mega homes currently are... one can always dream right
It makes more sense for a highway bus line to connect to some north/south bus connections to rapid transit. There is no way rapid transit will end up west of Park Royal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2413  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 8:59 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,970
There's a decent argument for an extension to Ambleside or Dunderave... in fifty years, when all the NIMBYs are long gone and replaced with slightly more tolerant NIMBYs. Meanwhile, it's going to be an absolute PITA to get a bus from the highway all the way up to Cypress Falls - they're really going to need that pie-in-the-sky gondola.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2414  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 9:14 PM
GenWhy? GenWhy? is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 3,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
BP will operate a private bus service until Translink ever decides to route a bus here. And the Upper Levels plan envisioned a highway bus route that might make sense here.
West Van residents take the BUS. That would be the day. I hope traffic there gets worse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2415  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 9:58 PM
idunno idunno is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 786
Critical bike network improvement moving forward for N Van: https://www.dnv.org/streets-transpor...g-improvements

A bike ride across the North Shore will get you on all sorts of facilities, but this section of Main is one of the scariest. It's only too bad that this project doesn't go all the way east to the bridgehead. I'll take what I can get though!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2416  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 10:03 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,540
The only way they'll make a case for transit is building. Look at every other municipality in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2417  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 10:39 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,970
Again though, just how and would TransLink get a bus line up to Cypress Falls? Burnaby Mountain already kills enough transmissions as it is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2418  
Old Posted May 12, 2022, 11:11 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Again though, just how and would TransLink get a bus line up to Cypress Falls? Burnaby Mountain already kills enough transmissions as it is.
I mean Production Way - SFU is up almost 200m. From the Cypress Bowl highway exit to the village it's about +97m near the point where I think they want transit to extend to. Beyond that section it is like 12% road grades.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2419  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 6:27 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,221
Quote:
Originally Posted by idunno View Post
Critical bike network improvement moving forward for N Van: https://www.dnv.org/streets-transpor...g-improvements
How do they plan on implementing this? I hope there is no crazy pipedream to claim one of the few traffic lanes to make it into a bikelane. Traffic on Main Street is already a permanent mess with no road capacity to spare.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2420  
Old Posted May 13, 2022, 7:31 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 10,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
How do they plan on implementing this? I hope there is no crazy pipedream to claim one of the few traffic lanes to make it into a bikelane. Traffic on Main Street is already a permanent mess with no road capacity to spare.
Seems like it's on the grass next to the sidewalk just headed west. If you fill the survey you'll get the renders.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:11 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.