Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlas
The relevant section of the bill:
The bill does not call out SLC directly. This definitely leaves the door open for Draper and the PoM State Land Authority too.
|
There are parts of the bill that do restrict the location to close to the Delta Center.
For instance, under the definitions:
(3) "Major professional sports league" means the National Basketball Association or the National Hockey League.
(4) "Project area" means the sports and entertainment project area according to the terms and requirements of this part.
(5) "Project participant" means a person that is approved to participate in the use of public funds in a project area according to the procedures and requirements of this part.
(6) "Qualified stadium" means a sports facility that:
(a) provides seating for spectators in a number that is reasonably consistent with the capacity of other stadiums used by other teams in the major professional sports league;
(b) is located within the project area; and
(c) (i) is in active use as the home venue of a major professional sports league team; or
(ii) in the case of a stadium that is proposed to be constructed, will be the home venue of a major professional sports league.
This does correlate with section 63N-3-1302 that Atlas provided:
(d) be roughly centered around, and include the entire property footprint of a currently existing qualified stadium;
(e) include the entire property footprint of any qualified stadium that is planned to be built;
(f) be contiguous; and
(g) have boundaries that are reasonably compact in relation to their distance from the currently existing qualified stadium.
This does seem to mean that it should be close to the Delta Center and include the Delta Center in the project area.
It also looks like this limits the location of the new arena based on the contiguous nature of the project area, seeing that the existing arena must be included.