Posted Apr 29, 2007, 11:09 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: las vegas
Posts: 56
|
|
Quote:
Exactly! I read everyone's posts almost on a daily basis, but rarely post myself - mainly because I believe CC is just another HUGE tourist trap. To me, that project makes a lot of sense for MGM, and people who have more money than they know what to do with and just want to be able to say that they own something in CC, or on the strip. To think that someone would consider living in that project on a full time basis, or even a second home that they plan on spending any good amount of time in, is a joke! I have lived in Vegas for almost ten years, and I avoid the strip like the plague. If you lived in CC, and worked in CC or neighboring property - okay, maybe. But honestly, have these buyers ever driven LV BLVD, or any street that runs perpendicular? To deal with that mess on a daily basis, you'd have to be out of your mind. Yes, I am a huge fan of downtown, because after all, it is the true center of the city, and the only place in Clark County that makes sense for people to live in a high rise on a full time basis. I know there are other projects like One LV, Queensridge, and even Sullivan Square - but where are they, and walking out the front door of the lobby, what do they have? They have the developer's idea for restaurants and shops, and the other amenities of the complex. It isn't the same as other great cities across the country where those who live in the true core of the city have the freedom to step out of the lobby and walk to other buildings for all of their everyday needs and wants - without having to fight with hundreds of thousands of tourists each day. Architecturally, CC is may be the next wonder of the world - but let's get real - it is the next "newer, bigger, better" LV tourist trap.
|
LVHIGHRISE
Quote:
Originally Posted by BruceH
It's more like urban versus suburban living. Our clients who bought CC already come from cities like Shanghai, Tokyo, London, Toronto, NYC etc where they are use to urban and high rise living. I live on the Strip in a high rise and love it. Can't stand the traffic going to suburbia. I can get to restaurants, airport, services etc all around the Strip in 15-20 minutes. Trip to Summerlin now takes about 30 to 45 minutes or worse depending on traffic. Demand for CC is high as are luxury condos like Sky Las Vegas, Turnberry Place and Turnberry Towers etc for residential living in the core Strip area. It will only get better with the billions of dollars being invested in all the new casino hotels in the main and North Strip areas.
|
LVHIGHRISE is pointing out the fact that there is no residential component to the casino condo towers beyond the living space. If someone lives in these props including sky,turnberry, and allure the only place to eat is a couple of 5 star restraunts costing a fortune or the casino food court or buffet. There is no supermarket and never will be. At CC a resident is locked into a tourist geared setting with no easy access to the real world. People from the highrise cities mentioned are accustomed to urban living yes, but having a home in the center of Disney Land is not the kind of place a majority of people rich or not are looking for.
A quick poll here. With the current allignment of the casino and other towers, who here thinks Echelon has any chance of being a profitable property.
I don't.
Last edited by sky-of-webs; Apr 29, 2007 at 11:11 PM.
Reason: spelling-grammar
|