Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy?
1) Middle redevelopment would have to follow standard tower separation standards. Shorter than it's neighbours by a fair bit, most likely
2) Constantly hear of folks trying to redevelop the one of those lots, but it's kinda not efficient to do so, from what I've heard, from a cost-benefit POV.
|
Why not cost efficient on point 2? Specific site conditions? Seems like very nice large assembly potential with limited amount of parties to engage. One is a Strata which can be tricky, but doable, unless the other building owner is unreasonable.
Though I do suppose what you would need is a density bonus to justify the size of development?
Wonder if some of those calculations change over the next couple of years if these two towers go in with success.
Threaded Mode