Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange
It's unfortunately too inflexible, benefits the developers and caters to SFH land usage. The plans need to be reworked. I'm not saying crazy density increases across the board are what's needed but the plans that were put is place by Vision are programmed poorly and too rigid.
|
How can it benefit the developers and also cater to SFH land usage at the same time?
Developers are chomping at the bit to provide more housing for the metro, leaving huge swaths of the city underzoned and under-densified does not help the development community. Nor does waffling on community plans and taking years to approve developments.
Threaded Mode