Posted Jun 11, 2015, 1:31 PM
|
 |
Urban Explorer
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 2,107
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crawford
To those who don't like the current design on the basis of it not harmonizing with the existing towers, what is your response to the new design being enthusiastically endorsed by the architects of the other towers?
Ingels went to Childs, Maki and Rogers during the design process and solicited their input. He presented the final version to all three, and all three reportedly endorsed the change.
Assuming the other architects were honest in their assessment, how can this be reconciled with the assessment given by many in this thread? I don't know the answer, but I'm asking, as there's obviously a disconnect.
|
I read this, but I can't in good faith believe it's actually true.
|
Threaded Mode