Quote:
Originally Posted by drew
The fact the report is so innocuous, makes it a head scratcher why the previous administration tried so hard to bury it.
|
But yet there were strenuous efforts to bury the report. It seems to me that if the city takes the time and money to hire consultants they should pay some heed to their recommendations. I guess the city did not want to explain why they ignored the report they commissioned, and why they downplayed concerns raised about the appropriateness of the cloverleaf site.
While I agree that the firehall seems to work in the current configuration of the interchange, it does make me wonder about how this could impact future upgrades. That interchange is poorly designed as it is and could be improved in a number of ways.