HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7881  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 8:41 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
The reality is quite the opposite. Coniferous trees are associated with cold climates. When one moves north from the equator, deciduous gives way to coniferous. BC is dominated by coniferous trees because its really far north. The further south one goes the more deciduous trees you'll see and the they're taller the further south you go. The evergreens in BC are tall because the coast is extremely wet. It's a rain forest.
Depends on the type of conifer. The south eastern U.S. is covered in coniferous Pines. Even Florida has a large amount of them.
     
     
  #7882  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 8:41 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,250
Here's a pic with some cold weather conifers ;-)


Frigid morning with downtown skyline, Calgary, Alberta by kgogrady, on Flickr
     
     
  #7883  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 9:32 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Amazing pic Surreal, very christmasy!



The legislature of BC always reminds me of Christmas. It's not quite a skyline, but it is the most significant part of the skyline so here it goes!


http://www.hellobc.com/victoria/things-to-do/festivals-events/all-events.aspx

http://www.ourenglish.org/xushijie.html
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7884  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 9:33 PM
blzyvr's Avatar
blzyvr blzyvr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 68
VanCity Skyline - North View

From floor 25 - The Capitol


Downtown. North View. by vancityhotshots, on Flickr
__________________
Left Coast Photographer & Skyscraper Aficionado
http://www.flickr.com/photos/blazinred
Gear used: Canon EOS 6D | iPhone 5s
     
     
  #7885  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 9:35 PM
blzyvr's Avatar
blzyvr blzyvr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 68
VanCity Skyline - West View

From The Capitol - Floor 25


Downtown North West View by vancityhotshots, on Flickr
__________________
Left Coast Photographer & Skyscraper Aficionado
http://www.flickr.com/photos/blazinred
Gear used: Canon EOS 6D | iPhone 5s
     
     
  #7886  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 9:37 PM
blzyvr's Avatar
blzyvr blzyvr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 68
VanCity Skyline - South West View

From The Capitol - Floor 25




Downtown West View by vancityhotshots, on Flickr
__________________
Left Coast Photographer & Skyscraper Aficionado
http://www.flickr.com/photos/blazinred
Gear used: Canon EOS 6D | iPhone 5s
     
     
  #7887  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 9:40 PM
blzyvr's Avatar
blzyvr blzyvr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 68
VanCity Yaletown Skyline View

Taken from the Cambie Bridge


Shot taken from the Cambie Bridge. Note: the two neon looking lines (red and blue) are actually two "Aqua Buses" arriving at the Yaletown pier.




This Yaletown neighbourhood skyline photo also represents the essence of "Vancouverism"




* Bio courtesy of WIKI:




"Vancouverism is an urban planning and architectural technique pioneered in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. It is characterized by mixed-use developments, typically with a medium-height, commercial base and narrow, high-rise residential towers to accommodate high populations and to preserve view corridors.




With a large residential population living in the city centre, no expressways connecting the core to the suburbs, and significant reliance on mass public transit, Vancouver is distinct from most large North American cities. In part, these reasons contribute to the fact that it is consistently ranked among the most livable cities in the world. An article in San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association has taken note of Vancouver's approach to new development and view corridors and asks if San Francisco should pursue similar direction.[1]




Renowned architect Bing Thom described Vancouverism this way:
It's a spirit about public space. I think Vancouverites are very, very proud that we built a city that really has a tremendous amount of space on the waterfront for people to recreate and to enjoy. At the same time, False Creek and Coal Harbour were previously industrial lands that were very polluted and desecrated. We've refreshed all of this with new development, and people have access to the water and the views. So, to me, it's this idea of having a lot people living very close together, mixing the uses. So, we have apartments on top of stores. In Surrey we have a university on top of a shopping centre. This mixing of uses reflects Vancouver in terms of our culture and how we live together.




Vancouverism developed as product of Vancouver's context. Wedged between the sea, mountains and the border with the United States, the Greater Vancouver Regional District partnered with the area's municipalities to encourage controlled development. Early recognition that British Columbia's farmland would be engulfed by sprawl led to the establishment of the Agricultural Land Reserve in the 1970s. This assisted in containing and intensifying development throughout the Vancouver metropolitan area and the Fraser Valley.[citation needed]
Architect Arthur Erickson is credited by some with developing the concept that became Vancouverism in the mid-1950s, in a never-realized development called "Project 56".[7] Many of the principles were incorporated into the development of the West End, which became the highest density neighbourhood on the west coast of North America by the 1960s. The city's planning department, under the direction of Ray Spaxman in the 1980s, began to expand on the concepts, many of which were brought into fruition with the development of the former Expo 86 lands along False Creek and Yaletown.




Another person who is credited with influencing Vancouverism is Jane Jacobs, author of The Death and Life of Great American Cities.[8] Brent Toderian, Director of Planning for the City of Vancouver says of Jacobs: “There isn't a person or book more influential in creating ‘Vancouverism' than Jane and The Death and Life”... “I know what she means about people misunderstanding density – that's why we emphasize density done well rather than density as a mathematical exercise. [But] people 'round the world praise Vancouver's livability, and she had a big hand in it.”[9]
Sight lines and height restrictions[edit]




One principle associated with Vancouverism, as evidenced by planning policy, involves protecting "view corridors". Vancouver's "View Protection Guidelines" were approved in 1989 and amended in 1990, establishing height limits to protect views of the North Shore Mountains. This approach, while credited with preserving the city's scenic backdrop, has been criticized for lessening visual interest and failing to represent the city's contemporary image. In response, Council commissioned a "Skyline Study" in 1997 which concluded that Vancouver's skyline would benefit from the addition of a handful of buildings exceeding current height limits, to add visual interest to Vancouver's skyline.[10]




The study found that opportunities for such buildings were restricted due to a limited number of large development sites in the downtown.[11] Eight years later, five of the seven sites identified for higher buildings had been planned or developed. The tallest of the new buildings is the Living Shangri-La hotel/residential tower, which was completed in 2008, and stands 201 metres (659 ft)[12] tall (62 stories)."




Downtown | Vancouver | Canada




"Yaletown" by vancityhotshots, on Flickr
__________________
Left Coast Photographer & Skyscraper Aficionado
http://www.flickr.com/photos/blazinred
Gear used: Canon EOS 6D | iPhone 5s

Last edited by blzyvr; Dec 29, 2013 at 9:41 PM. Reason: Insert verbiage
     
     
  #7888  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 9:48 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
It's best to post things all in one post rather than several successive posts. You're new to the forum so I just thought I'd let you know the "etiquette." Cool pics though, looks like the redevelopment of the Sears building is moving along great!
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7889  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 9:52 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #7890  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 10:12 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,250
     
     
  #7891  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 10:13 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,250
     
     
  #7892  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2013, 10:41 PM
whiteford's Avatar
whiteford whiteford is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,526
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
What a bizarre contrast. The right side of the river looks like it could be in Arkansas, the left looks like a very harsh northern region like NWT.
that is actual boreal forest on the north side of the river. in fact that is where the tree line for our northern forest starts .that is what makes that photo so special. one world ends while a larger, wilder world begins.
__________________
North Battleford!?!.... jeez how did this happen?
     
     
  #7893  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2013, 2:28 AM
Everyday Everyday is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 41
What a shot, SP.
     
     
  #7894  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2013, 2:32 AM
lake of the nations's Avatar
lake of the nations lake of the nations is offline
Utilisateur enregistré
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sherbrooke
Posts: 2,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denscity View Post
BC is no further north than anywhere else in Canada. And has the highest percentage of evergreen trees in the country i believe. And California is famous for its Redwoods and is definitely not far north. Therefore it must be a west coast thing and perhaps an elevation as opposed to a latitude issue?
Actually, it is both. It depends on climate, which mainly depends on altitude and latitude. An increase in elevation of 1 km has the same effect on temperature as a move of more than 1000 km north. A great example of this phenomenon can be seen in Nevada, were boreal-like forest borders desert.

What makes this drastic duality possible? The answer lies in one thing: elevation. The climate and species that can be found on the mountains of Nevada have much more in common with BC's and Alberta's than they do with those found on the flat ground at the foot of these mountains.
     
     
  #7895  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2013, 9:34 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Denscity View Post
BC is no further north than anywhere else in Canada. And has the highest percentage of evergreen trees in the country i believe. And California is famous for its Redwoods and is definitely not far north. Therefore it must be a west coast thing and perhaps an elevation as opposed to a latitude issue?
You realize that practically everyone in eastern Canada or about 23 million people live further south than Vancouver? If Toronto and Halifax were on the west coast they'd both be in northern California.

The west coast of north America is very mild for its latitude and is home to a number of micro climates. That evergreens are so plentiful in California is an oddity. In most of north America, evergreens are in the north where the climate is harsh and the population sparse. It's only when one gets as far south as Barrie, Ottawa, and Moncton that evergreens give way to deciduous and you start seeing bucolic farm country and large population centres.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #7896  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2013, 9:53 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
It's best to post things all in one post rather than several successive posts. You're new to the forum so I just thought I'd let you know the "etiquette." Cool pics though, looks like the redevelopment of the Sears building is moving along great!
EDIT - forget it.
     
     
  #7897  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2013, 10:28 AM
RyeJay RyeJay is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,086
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
You realize that practically everyone in eastern Canada or about 23 million people live further south than Vancouver? If Toronto and Halifax were on the west coast they'd both be in northern California.

The west coast of north America is very mild for its latitude and is home to a number of micro climates. That evergreens are so plentiful in California is an oddity. In most of north America, evergreens are in the north where the climate is harsh and the population sparse. It's only when one gets as far south as Barrie, Ottawa, and Moncton that evergreens give way to deciduous and you start seeing bucolic farm country and large population centres.

Considering that our climate can be very harsh -- an on-going example being the power outages in Ontario, Québec, and New Brunswick due to severe ice and snow storms -- maybe we need to improve our process of weighing the pros and cons when making decisions about urban landscaping and urban forests?

The power outages, mostly, are being caused by the bending and falling branches of deciduous trees. Perhaps we need to be more openminded towards planting confiers.

Most obviously, we need to stop waiting to underground our power utilities.

Underground ultilities, being more expensive than conventional powerlines, would provide more incentive for curbing community sprawl.
     
     
  #7898  
Old Posted Dec 30, 2013, 2:40 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
You realize that practically everyone in eastern Canada or about 23 million people live further south than Vancouver? If Toronto and Halifax were on the west coast they'd both be in northern California.
Toronto is at 43°42′N, putting it in central - southern Oregon at best. Halifax, at 44°51′16″N, would be in central - northern Oregon at best, just to be clear...
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
  #7899  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2013, 9:29 AM
isaidso isaidso is offline
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,065
^^ Ok, Oregon not northern California.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RyeJay View Post
Considering that our climate can be very harsh -- an on-going example being the power outages in Ontario, Québec, and New Brunswick due to severe ice and snow storms -- maybe we need to improve our process of weighing the pros and cons when making decisions about urban landscaping and urban forests?

The power outages, mostly, are being caused by the bending and falling branches of deciduous trees. Perhaps we need to be more openminded towards planting confiers.

Most obviously, we need to stop waiting to underground our power utilities.

Underground ultilities, being more expensive than conventional powerlines, would provide more incentive for curbing community sprawl.
That's rather over blown, imo. We've had 2 major ice storms in the past 20 years. I do agree that power lines need to be buried. It's technology cities in wealthy countries started implementing 100 years ago. It's shocking that we still have overhead lines in our cities. The only reason people don't complain is that they're so used to them being there they don't think it's bizarre.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT

Last edited by isaidso; Dec 31, 2013 at 9:43 AM.
     
     
  #7900  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2013, 12:17 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Point Pelee is on the same latitude as Northern California border.

It is the only place in Canada to reach that far southern latitude.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.