Wonder if they considered using traffic circles to reduce the number of intersections, or if that would be too chaotic.
Even a short trenched section, dipping under some of the cross streets like in Washington DC would be better than what they are proposing
Or you could combine the two and have a traffic circle with a dip for thru-traffic underneath (which they also have in DC)
Not opposed to removing the viaducts, but replacing it with more roads and gridlock doesn't make the area more "livable" either.
Last edited by makr3trkr; May 2, 2013 at 8:23 PM.
|
Threaded Mode