HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1221  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2009, 9:06 PM
phesto phesto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: yvr/bwi
Posts: 2,699
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
The brentwood project looks great, and if my eyes do not decieve me it appears as though the large office tower is a multi-phase building as the second rendering shows the office tower with the same design but half the height. in the main rendering it shows a distinctive split in the tower. This project is by far my most anticipated of the bunch, and one of my most anticipated in the next few years in all the metro.
The plan didn’t include vertical phasing, but envisioned two alternate schemes – one with 29-storey and 10-storey office towers, and the other with 15-storey and 7-storey towers. (the architect is showing both schemes here) If the project was to move ahead, it would most likely be the shorter scheme with less office space. In any event, the project will be phased so that the south half is developed first with residential and retail, and the office later (ie. much later).

It’s on hold at the moment though, so it will likely go through more design iterations before it is actually built.

Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
One comment is that the back on the project on Dawson St. does not have retail - if that's supposed to be the retail high street (continuing from Tandem @ Gilmore) then that'll have to change.
Not sure if these renderings are supposed to accurately depict the surrounding context, but the proposed development does NOT front Dawson Street. The developer didn't assemble the lots across the lane. The existing retail/commercial strip will remain there and it is indeed the City of Burnaby’s intent to keep this as a retail frontage (they call it ‘Village Street’) zoning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1222  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2009, 9:32 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Cool - thanks!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1223  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2009, 9:52 PM
cornholio cornholio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Looks like it - but that wouldn't help Dawson if Dawson continues as a retail street east of Willingdon.
I dont think this development fronts Dawson street from what I remember.

edit: guess Phesto beat me too it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1224  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2009, 10:25 PM
DKaz DKaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kelowna BC & Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,299
It doesn't look like Dawson on the south perimeter, just an extended Sumas St.

The 29 storey office seems to be designed to initially start off at 15 storeys with a future 14 storey addition. Phased buildings FTW. This would be our third phased building in Metro Vancouver, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1225  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2009, 10:56 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
3 phased projects off the top of my head -
Bentall V
Staples buildng in Metrotown
Guildford Corporate Centre (not sure if phase II added yet)
(and that small office building at Production Way Station may also have been phased (the first phase being retail only?))
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1226  
Old Posted Oct 5, 2009, 11:53 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
Quote:
(and that small office building at Production Way Station may also have been phased (the first phase being retail only?))
Ya it was. I remember cause it looked ridiculous from the station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1227  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2009, 12:33 AM
bahbahblacksheep bahbahblacksheep is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14
Luxe (http://www.liveatluxe.com/#/home) but 1 of my friend's brother bought it last year & apparently it didn't go through…not enough buyers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1228  
Old Posted Oct 6, 2009, 3:52 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
thats too bad but it was a weird location
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1229  
Old Posted Oct 15, 2009, 1:05 AM
East Van East Van is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PacificNorthWest
Posts: 713
The Carlyle, Oct 9.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1230  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2009, 9:30 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
New West Record:

Quote:
City expropriates land for civic centre

Theresa Mcmanus
The Record


Wednesday, October 21, 2009


CREDIT: Larry Wright/THE RECORD
Wanted: The city is eyeing expropriation of properties along Columbia Street, between Eighth and Begbie streets.


The City of New Westminster is moving to expropriate several parcels of land for the future downtown multi-use civic facility.

The city believes that the site, located on Columbia Street between Eighth and Begbie streets, is the best location for the $35-million multi-use civic facility.

"The site selection process examined 13 potential sites in the downtown, including city-owned property, to find an optimum location," said Lisa Spitale, the city's director of development services. "The final selection of the site was made due to its physical size and location, and it ensures accessibility by residents while boosting downtown revitalization at the same time."

On Monday, the city announced it was beginning expropriation proceedings to secure the land parcels, after several months of negotiations with the property owners.

Acting mayor Jonathan Cote said this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to build a multi-use civic facility.

"It was critically important we find the right site," he said. "The city only gets one chance."

Cote said the project will help advance the city's downtown revitalization efforts and provide a new state-of-the-art facility that meets the needs of current residents, visitors and new arrivals to the Royal City. He said the location is perfect - fronting on to Columbia Street and with ready access to transit, Hyack Square, the Quay and the future Westminster Pier Park.

"That whole Eighth and Columbia (corner) becomes very interesting," he said. "It is a gateway into the downtown."

Jim Lowrie, the city's acting city administrator, said the city has been negotiating with four different property owners since April, but hasn't been able to come to terms regarding the purchase of the sites.

"It is the nature of the game. They each have varying tenants," he said. "It is an assembly of four parcels of land. It complicates it somewhat."

In total, the development parcel would make up about 40,000 square feet, including a portion of Alexander Street that would be closed. The site would be bordered by Eighth and Begbie Streets, from Columbia Street to below the SkyTrain guideway.

Lowrie said the city sent letters to affected tenants Monday informing them of the city's desire to acquire the sites within 60 days. The city won't be starting construction of the building until 2011.

"They have got over a year to look at alternate locations," he said. "We, the city, will be helping them in any way we can though our economic development officer."

Lowrie believes there's room for further movement in negotiations in the next 60 days.

"If the property owner feels what the city is offering as far as fair market value is not appropriate, they can take the matter to Supreme Court," he said. "The city is willing to pay fair market value."

Lowrie said the city wants to finalize the detailed design and community consultation in 2010 and begin construction in early 2011.

"We want to pay market value for the property," he stressed. "Property owners are protected under the Expropriation Act of B.C."

Cote said the city legally isn't entitled to go above market value, as that's considered aiding a property owner.

"We need to move forward on this project," he said. "We need to begin the public consultation process."

Cote said the City of Nanaimo had to expropriate about a dozen properties to build its civic centre. He said it's not uncommon for expropriation to occur when large projects are proposed in downtowns.

The new multi-use civic facility is being funded by development assistance compensation funds as a result of casino development within city limits. It will be approximately 80,000 square feet and may include amenities such as flexible theatre space, arts studios, recreation space, archives and museum facilities, meeting rooms, banquet and convention meeting space.

While the city has consulted with citizens about community needs through various planning initiatives, Cote said the city is eager to start consulting with residents about what they'd like to see in a civic centre.

"That is going to be able to move ahead now," he said. "We wanted to wait until we had a location."

© The Record (New Westminster) 2009
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1231  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2009, 12:44 AM
Xrayal's Avatar
Xrayal Xrayal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 174
New Burnaby Public Library

Tommy Douglas Library to Open late October/early November as per Burnaby Public Library Website.

View from across the intersection of Kingsway and Edmonds

View from across Kingsway

View from Walker Ave.

Signage
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1232  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2009, 12:58 AM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,141
Looks pretty disappointing to be honest. I thought it was going to turn out better than that. It just looks cheap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1233  
Old Posted Oct 27, 2009, 1:16 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
David
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia
Posts: 1,453
looks good. much nicer than the main branch, thats for sure
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1234  
Old Posted Oct 28, 2009, 5:54 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Looks pretty disappointing to be honest. I thought it was going to turn out better than that. It just looks cheap.
The corrugated steel is what ruins it. It should have been either all glass or a combination of brick and stone. The library does look fairy good at night when it's all lit up though. The coloured glass panels really stand out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1235  
Old Posted Oct 29, 2009, 12:28 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by East Van View Post
The Carlyle, Oct 9.
the over pass to queens park is coming along too
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1236  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2009, 12:13 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,067
highrises in aldergrove?

Put highrises on main street, not on side streets, say locals


A commercial property owner says Langley Township's proposal to allow highrises in clusters removed from Fraser Highway is of "no use" and should instead "focus on redeveloping Fraser Highway" by allowing highrises on the main street.

Ray DeWolff and his family have owned a commercial property on Fraser Highway for the past seven years and he says the Township could revive main street "with the stroke of a pen; it wouldn't cost the Township anything."

DeWolff is staunchly opposed to a bypass to divert traffic from Fraser Highway because the high-traffic visibility is good for business, provided the street parking problem is solved.

This problem could be solved by negotiating trades with the property owners, says DeWolff.

"I would gladly sign over 12 feet of frontage in exchange for the zoning to build 15 or 20 storeys. And I think other property owners would feel the same because the property values of the new zoning would more than compensate for the loss of an extra 12 feet on each side of Fraser Highway to allow for four lanes of traffic plus street parking," said DeWolff.

DeWolff is happy with his current building at 27118 Fraser Highway (The Aldergrove Star is one of his tenants) and takes pride in maintaining it for his two commercial street-level tenants and four residential tenants in the two floors above. He's also pleased to see some of his neighbouring landlords, such as Aldergrove's Gordy Clark, have gone to great lengths to "spiff" up their buildings.

However, he's noticed that some landlords have "let their places go because they can't rent them out for enough to fix them up. And part of the problem is that they don't have enough parking spots."

And if highrises are only permitted in clusters off Fraser Highway without widening the highway this will only create more gridlock on Fraser Highway, reasons DeWolff.

Longtime Aldergrove resident Peter Klynsoon agrees with DeWolff's assessment. Klynsoon wrote to The Star: "Either plan (put forward by the Township) calls for 16 storey buildings, up to six towers... but there is absolutely no plan for transportation. Think of all these 6,000 new residents getting in their car at 6 a.m. on a Fraser Highway that is already congested at this time of day... where is the streetcar or ALRT?"

Klynsoon adds, "It is absolutely unacceptable that the taxpayers of Aldergrove could live with this developer's dream."

DeWolff says the only solution is to "redevelop Fraser Highway to make it work for everybody. They could follow the example of Georgia Street downtown — it has highrises and four lanes of traffic plus street parking on both sides.

"The Township has so much power to do this, with the simple stroke of a pen."

http://www.bclocalnews.com/surrey_area/aldergrovestar/news/69193247.html
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1237  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2009, 1:10 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
This article demonstrates the problems of having municipalities who don't want to adhere to the Livable Region Strategic Plan (which the new Growth Strategy replaces).

Quote:
The Tri-City News
Coquitlam council backs Metro Vancouver growth strategy
By Sarah Payne - The Tri-City News


Published: November 03, 2009 2:00 PM
Updated: November 03, 2009 2:42 PM


The Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy is a work in progress, and one that Coquitlam supports — for now.

At its meeting Monday, council agreed to receive the current version of the strategy and to have staff continue working with the regional government so that “it fits with us,” said Mayor Richard Stewart.

“This is not to accept the Regional Growth Strategy, although I think everyone at the table accepts that we ought to be trying to make sure our growth strategy is a regional one and not 22 local little ones,” he added.

The agreement comes after a visit from Metro’s chief administrator, Johnny Carline, last month in which he outlined the region’s plans for sustainable communities. Metro’s goals are to continue creating compact urban areas, support sustainable economies, protect natural assets and develop communities with a proper mix of residential, industrial and commercial. The regional district also hopes to see a strong transit system to connect the region.

But how those goals are achieved made some officials at Coquitlam’s land use and economic development committee meeting (held Oct. 26) uncomfortable, and hesitant to hand over its autonomy to a regional body.

“In the end, the problem isn’t you,” Stewart said to Carline after that presentation. “The problem is there are 22 of us [other municipalities] and each one of us is hoping the other is going to behave responsibly.”

Carline was quick to point out the regional district did not want to circumvent decisions made by local governments.

“We don’t want to do at the regional level what you can do better at the local level,” he said. “We think there are a lot of decisions that belong to the local municipalities.”

Carline is presenting the plans to all of Metro’s member municipalities and hopes to have the strategy approved before the Olympics.

On top of fears that the strategy undermines local authority, Coquitlam also had concerns with Metro’s methodology for population, employment and dwelling projections, and establishing a restrictive industrial land designation.

Since then, Carline said Metro has addressed some of the issues councillors raised in order to find a compromise.

“We’re moving forward with this recommendation but by no means are we buying into the whole plan until we see the whole thing at the end,” said Coun. Mae Reid.

Coun. Lou Sekora voted against staff’s recommendations to continue working with Metro Vancouver on resolving any remaining concerns, saying an unelected regional government shouldn’t be telling city officials how to handle planning decisions in their community.

[email protected]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1238  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2009, 2:04 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
From the Journal of Commerce:

Quote:
November 4, 2009

Project progress
Permits issued for Arthur Erickson-designed community in West Vancouver


MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT

Development permits for the first phase of the Evelyn Drive master planned community in West Vancouver, B.C. are in hand. It will soon go out to tender. The community was designed by Arthur Erickson and is being developed by Millennium Development Corporation.

Apartments and condos will be built to achieve LEED Silver certification and cluster housing will meet a LEED Silver equivalent. Evelyn Drive comprises almost 21 acres and 349 residential units. Site preparation is complete, but subdivision approval is still necessary before construction can begin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1239  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2009, 7:18 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1240  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2009, 7:36 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,976
Thanks, pretty good for suburbs in a metro-area of only 2.5 million, not to mention all of the other pocket town centers with towers in our area. Honestly, Metrotown alone has about the same number of towers one can find in Downtown Phoenix (at least when I was there 5 years ago).
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:30 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.