Quote:
Originally Posted by ardecila
|
Sorry, I didn't realize a thread had already existed. It looks like it has been removed though...?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaron38
House overwhelmingly passes Amtrak funding bill
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/amtrak_co...IJn_yANhhhr7sF
The bill passed, with veto proof margins in both houses of Congress. Which is good news because Bush said he was going to veto it, cause, you know, vetoing mass transit funding is the best way to stick it to Al-Queda...
|
Thanks for the bulletin, aaron38. I saw that it has veto-proof margins in both houses, as well, and am pretty thrilled.
The veto threat apparently stems from George Bush's belief that the bill doesn't hold Amtrak accountable.
You know, I'm all for fiscal conservatism -- I'd like to think of myself as a "liberal" of the classical variety -- but today's Republicans, with 43 at the helm, have totally turned that notion on its head. Kowtowing to Big Business to avoid forcing our country to take an abrupt and maybe painful turn towards energy independence is not in our economic interest and certainly not in the interest of our security, especially when most of the world's oil is beneath antagonistic states.
If George Bush truly operated out of concern for this country's financial well-being, he wouldn't reject the bill but ask that extra measures be included to ensure efficiency.
And how exactly is public funding for a national highway system all fair and good but for mass transportation reckless?