HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


    The Butterfly in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Vancouver Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1921  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2026, 11:52 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,767
[IMG]butterfly by bcborn, on Flickr[/IMG]
[IMG]butterfly2 by bcborn, on Flickr[/IMG]
my photos
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1922  
Old Posted Jul 18, 2026, 10:15 PM
bb1510 bb1510 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 679
Is it safe to assume the project that's offering a 700 psf in closing adjustments with an NDA is the butterfly?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1923  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2026, 3:47 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb1510 View Post
Is it safe to assume the project that's offering a 700 psf in closing adjustments with an NDA is the butterfly?
There was an article in the Globe & Mail about the increased popularity of NDAs in new condo sales:

Condo developers are offering big discounts in exchange for signing NDAs
ERICA ALINIPERSONAL ECONOMICS REPORTER
PUBLISHED JULY 2, 2026
UPDATED JULY 4, 2026
FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Some developers are offering buyers of new condos steep discounts, provided they sign confidentiality clauses, as the sector continues to struggle with sluggish sales and mounting inventory.

Anthony Scilipoti, president and chief executive officer of Veritas Investment Research, a Toronto-based equity research firm, said that during a secret shopper exercise in Vancouver earlier this year, he was offered this kind of a discount on a new condo. Subject to signing a non-disclosure agreement, he was promised savings of around $700 a square foot.…

… In a report for clients about this year’s secret-shopping research, Veritas said prospective buyers should also be aware that market listings for new condo buildings do not always reflect the full inventory of units available for sale.

“What we have now is a market obscured by shadow prices and a shadow inventory,” the report warned.….


https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investin...s-discount-sales-developers-real-estate/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1924  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2026, 10:28 PM
kikin kikin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2025
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb1510 View Post
Is it safe to assume the project that's offering a 700 psf in closing adjustments with an NDA is the butterfly?
what would that put the price to then?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1925  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2026, 3:54 AM
bb1510 bb1510 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by kikin View Post
what would that put the price to then?
I don't know, but I just know that for every sale 1500 psf is just to service the loans on the project right now, excluding hard and soft costs
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1926  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2026, 2:31 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by bb1510 View Post
I don't know, but I just know that for every sale 1500 psf is just to service the loans on the project right now, excluding hard and soft costs
I was looking on realtor Mike Stewart’s webpage and his stats show the average sale price in the building at $1,073 sq/ft. Longest days on the market is 526.

https://www.mikestewart.ca/idx/listing.r3125671-702-1033-nelson-street-vancouver-v6e-0e5.108805648/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1927  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2026, 4:51 PM
bb1510 bb1510 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 679
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
I was looking on realtor Mike Stewart’s webpage and his stats show the average sale price in the building at $1,073 sq/ft. Longest days on the market is 526.

https://www.mikestewart.ca/idx/listing.r3125671-702-1033-nelson-street-vancouver-v6e-0e5.108805648/
Yes, those are just resale units. I'm referring to developer units and it was insider info from a commercial lender.

Basically, if a unit sells for 2600 psf from the developer, 1500 psf of that 2600 psf is just to service the loan, excluding any hard and soft costs.

Westbank took out a secondary mortgage from the Pacific Alliance Group I believe in 2024 on the Butterfly and it's also registered on all their Japanese developments too. The max default interest in the docs state prime plus 40%, but that's the max rate and probably not the actual interest, but I assume it's very high.

PAG is also the fund that successfully sued the fugitive Miles Guo in the US for default
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1928  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2026, 9:23 PM
kikin kikin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2025
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
I was looking on realtor Mike Stewart’s webpage and his stats show the average sale price in the building at $1,073 sq/ft. Longest days on the market is 526.

https://www.mikestewart.ca/idx/listing.r3125671-702-1033-nelson-street-vancouver-v6e-0e5.108805648/
that is a crazy low price, that building must be cursed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1929  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2026, 11:35 PM
AlessioSBT AlessioSBT is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 109
Not only that.
I know there are a lot of amenities but the strata fee is already higher than average and this is the period where usually they are artificially low to attract buyers.

In 10 years a 700sqft 2 bd will easily go over 1000/month at this rate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1930  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2026, 8:33 AM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,767
This is one project that should definitely have been a combo hotel/condo tower. It’s in a much better location than some of the new proposals, the iconic architecture would have made it instantly recognizable and aided marketing. Given Westbank’s experience with the Shanghai-La I am really surprised they didn’t go that route. It would have cushioned them from what’s happening now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1931  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2026, 2:43 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
This is one project that should definitely have been a combo hotel/condo tower. It’s in a much better location than some of the new proposals, the iconic architecture would have made it instantly recognizable and aided marketing. Given Westbank’s experience with the Shanghai-La I am really surprised they didn’t go that route. It would have cushioned them from what’s happening now.
Given that they developed both the (former) Shangri-La and the Fairmont Pacific Rim, they presumably considered that possibility, but the economics of a hotel/condo tower could have been worse. They needed to generate enough profit to cover the cost of the seismic rebuild of the church premises (($25m+) and the social housing building for the church. The decision to build a luxury tower made sense at the time they went ahead, but circumstances changed. A hotel in the base of the tower would almost certainly have been valued at less than the apartments that have been built.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1932  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2026, 12:14 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Given that they developed both the (former) Shangri-La and the Fairmont Pacific Rim, they presumably considered that possibility, but the economics of a hotel/condo tower could have been worse. They needed to generate enough profit to cover the cost of the seismic rebuild of the church premises (($25m+) and the social housing building for the church. The decision to build a luxury tower made sense at the time they went ahead, but circumstances changed. A hotel in the base of the tower would almost certainly have been valued at less than the apartments that have been built.
Of course hindsight is 20/20 but a hotel would have helped spread out the risk. From what I can tell going back construction didn’t start until 2018 and by then the clampdown on foreign buyers was two years old. They should have seen the result coming.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1933  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2026, 6:38 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Of course hindsight is 20/20 but a hotel would have helped spread out the risk. From what I can tell going back construction didn’t start until 2018 and by then the clampdown on foreign buyers was two years old. They should have seen the result coming.
But the clampdown on foreign buyers isn't what's (mainly) responsible for the current market slowdown.

It's a part of it, .....sure,....but the effects might seem a tad overblown.

As far back as then or 2019 it became clear that the remedies that were being instituted at the time like foreign buyers clampdown and the empty homes tax were having impact but more on the minimal side rather than the paradigm-shifting change many hoped for.

The current market slowdown has more to do with what came after both in the immediate aftermath (specifically the pandemic and lockdown, and the global inflation crisis that followed), as well as the more recent events that have exacerbated it and accelerated the slowdown (pun not intended).
Specifically the impact of this most recent tariff war and the worsening of Inflation, and the spike in interest rates.

I mean,...sure the overall market was already over-leveraged and over-valued by that point and due for a correction, but back in 2018, nobody could have foreseen any of the things I've mentioned happening since then - starting with the pandemic in '20 and everything that's followed since,...right up until a 2nd Trump term 4 years later, and all that that's entailed as far as Canada-US trade relations are concerned (certainly not THAT given what 2020 was) - and all the after-effects that have followed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1934  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2026, 8:58 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
But the clampdown on foreign buyers isn't what's (mainly) responsible for the current market slowdown.

It's a part of it, .....sure,....but the effects might seem a tad overblown.

As far back as then or 2019 it became clear that the remedies that were being instituted at the time like foreign buyers clampdown and the empty homes tax were having impact but more on the minimal side rather than the paradigm-shifting change many hoped for.

The current market slowdown has more to do with what came after both in the immediate aftermath (specifically the pandemic and lockdown, and the global inflation crisis that followed), as well as the more recent events that have exacerbated it and accelerated the slowdown (pun not intended).
Specifically the impact of this most recent tariff war and the worsening of Inflation, and the spike in interest rates.

I mean,...sure the overall market was already over-leveraged and over-valued by that point and due for a correction, but back in 2018, nobody could have foreseen any of the things I've mentioned happening since then - starting with the pandemic in '20 and everything that's followed since,...right up until a 2nd Trump term 4 years later, and all that that's entailed as far as Canada-US trade relations are concerned (certainly not THAT given what 2020 was) - and all the after-effects that have followed.
Perhaps but I’d argue The Butterfly and Westbank projects in general were susceptible the most to a foreign buyers clampdown. None of us have seen sales figures for Oakridge….
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1935  
Old Posted Aug 19, 2026, 11:58 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,767
Price discovery is a b!tch:

Mortimer
@mortimer_1
20h
We have a sale in the Butterfly building in Vancouver, Canada and it’s a KABOOM 💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣

Closed in 2023: $4,830,000

Just sold for $2,850,000

$1,980,000 loss + expenses

41% loss 😮😮😮💣💣💣

#4503 1033 Nelson Street, Vancouver


https://x.com/mortimer_1/status/2089915991216247049
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1936  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2026, 4:09 PM
s211 s211 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Price discovery is a b!tch:

Mortimer
@mortimer_1
20h
We have a sale in the Butterfly building in Vancouver, Canada and it’s a KABOOM 💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣

Closed in 2023: $4,830,000

Just sold for $2,850,000

$1,980,000 loss + expenses

41% loss 😮😮😮💣💣💣

#4503 1033 Nelson Street, Vancouver


https://x.com/mortimer_1/status/2089915991216247049
$2M loss and still $2M too expensive
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1937  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2026, 4:25 PM
djmk's Avatar
djmk djmk is offline
victory in near
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 1,784
why would anyone spend $4.8M on a 1500 sq/ft concrete box in the sky? You can buy some really nice houses for $4.8M
__________________
i have no idea what's going on
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1938  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2026, 4:41 PM
Glow Fun City's Avatar
Glow Fun City Glow Fun City is online now
deadhead raver Jew
 
Join Date: Jul 2025
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
why would anyone spend $4.8M on a 1500 sq/ft concrete box in the sky? You can buy some really nice houses for $4.8M

or even $2.8M!
__________________
Don’t tell me this town ain’t got no heart
You just gotta poke around…
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1939  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2026, 5:09 PM
AlessioSBT AlessioSBT is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmk View Post
why would anyone spend $4.8M on a 1500 sq/ft concrete box in the sky? You can buy some really nice houses for $4.8M
Because the owners of these units don't actually live in them. Most of the owners don't even know how these units look like, they just get bought for them by some investment firm.

And the people working at the investment firm don't care about "context" or "logic", the market went up X percentage a year, the units are from a known builder, the number (in that moment) makes sense, that's it, they just buy them and think they will sell them after X years for a profit.

There's no logic anywhere in all of this, it's just an automatic process that was used for years with no problem and like in any industry when something make money no one says a word.

Last edited by AlessioSBT; Aug 20, 2026 at 11:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1940  
Old Posted Yesterday, 12:36 AM
bb1510 bb1510 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 679
I've been inside some of the estate units at the Butterfly and some are pretty pleasant.

However, the 03 plan is truly horrible. The window in the second bedroom is tiny; it's short and narrow - basically like a basement suite window since it's also located so high up. It faces east so you'd expect good morning sun but it just doesn't get any. The secondary bedroom is better suited as a home office, albeit a poor one; the glass tertiary bedrooms make a much better home office. Also, the door to the primary opens directly into the centre of the bedroom and the living space
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.