HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1381  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2025, 8:28 PM
sopdx sopdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 584
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyPDX View Post
I’m still confused what this means. Pushing Seattle as the international/big hub moves more connecting flights to pdx? Connecting to where, Seattle? Not international, obviously, outside maybe some codeshare connections.

Per BTS website, Alaska carried 10% fewer passenger out of pdx in 2024 than it did in 2018 (peak year), and Jan 2025 is 2% lower than Jan 2020 (just before Covid was the peak). So where exactly are these 200% increase in connecting flights going? Hawaiian also decreased YOY Jan 2024-2025.
I'm assuming from NW/Alaskan cities to California and points south and east. JFK PDX BOI and so on.

I wonder and perhaps someone can clarify this for me, doesn't it seem that SEA will reach a saturation point to flights to Asia? Maybe Alaska's plan is to starve out other carriers.

Also, considering so many flights connecting through PDX, wouldn't it make sense to have at least one Hawaiian flight from PDX to Asia?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1382  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2025, 2:08 PM
PhillyPDX PhillyPDX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by sopdx View Post
I'm assuming from NW/Alaskan cities to California and points south and east. JFK PDX BOI and so on.

I wonder and perhaps someone can clarify this for me, doesn't it seem that SEA will reach a saturation point to flights to Asia? Maybe Alaska's plan is to starve out other carriers.

Also, considering so many flights connecting through PDX, wouldn't it make sense to have at least one Hawaiian flight from PDX to Asia?
I think Alaska's point IS to starve out other carriers. Delta made a huge push into SEA around the 2000's, and encroached on Alaska's turf, which I then think is was prompted Alaska to finally tie up with American (previously being proudly independent). Airlines need to win turf wars to allow them to jack up prices and earn profits.

Agree on your latter statement, and that would be something I could see increasing a significant need for connecting flights.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1383  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2025, 3:33 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,101
The equilibrium point for overseas flights at Sea-Tac should be pretty high.

The airlines needed capacity in the PNW but it was limited. Sea-Tac has addressed this by adding a new runway to enable two-runway service in bad visibility and more recently building a far larger international arrivals facility. This has brought a long ramp up in international flights at Sea-Tac since 2010 or so, with last year's 6,588,580 easily a record high. That included Europe at 2,000,365 and Asia at 2,197,209. This year Jan-Mar has trended toward the mid-7s though Mar lost some steam.

My guess is it'll grow by a couple million in the next 5-10 years if the administration tones things down.
__________________
"Alot" has never been a word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1384  
Old Posted May 1, 2025, 12:54 PM
babs babs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 494
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhillyPDX View Post
I think Alaska's point IS to starve out other carriers. Delta made a huge push into SEA around the 2000's, and encroached on Alaska's turf, which I then think is was prompted Alaska to finally tie up with American (previously being proudly independent). Airlines need to win turf wars to allow them to jack up prices and earn profits.

Agree on your latter statement, and that would be something I could see increasing a significant need for connecting flights.
I remember reading about this previously. The reason Alaska joined OneWorld was twofold. One, to counter Delta in Seattle. And Second, several large Seattle area companies had told Alaska, they were going to take their business to Delta since Delta offered a much larger network. Most of this growth in Seattle is to hold on to those extremely valuable Seattle corporate accounts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1385  
Old Posted May 2, 2025, 5:48 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,081
The final roof cassette is now in place

Video Link
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1386  
Old Posted May 2, 2025, 11:27 PM
uncommon.name's Avatar
uncommon.name uncommon.name is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 585
Reminder that Allegient Air's PDX route expansion begins this month to the following Airports:
Fresno, California, flights begin May 22. Introductory fares start at $49 one-way.
Cincinnati flights begin May 23. Introductory fares start at $79 one-way.
Flint, Michigan, flights begin May 23. Introductory fares start at $79 one-way.
Indianapolis flights begin May 23. Introductory fares start at $49 one-way.
__________________
Don't be afraid to give up the good to go for the great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1387  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 6:32 PM
PhillyPDX PhillyPDX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 804
Interesting. I wonder how PDX might play into all of this.

https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2025/05/alaska-will-fly-sea-tac-to-europe-next-year.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1388  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 8:04 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,081
In the immediate future, it won't. Alaska has said that they're only planning new long haul flights out of Seattle. Aside from anything else, they don't have the fleet to start adding long haul routes from their other hubs.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1389  
Old Posted May 9, 2025, 9:01 PM
subterranean subterranean is offline
Registered Ugly
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland
Posts: 3,849
Not that there haven't been a bunch of photos posted already, but I did snap a few on my way out of town last week. I posted them at the top of this photo thread.

It looks better in person than I had seen in pictures previously. Overall, I found the baggage drop and security check for Alaska to be a much more pleasant experience. The automated, round security bin stations were a super nice touch and kept things moving really smoothly. I also found the main atrium to be really pretty quiet considering how many people were moving through there, which was kind of a surprising but welcome consequence of the materials used.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1390  
Old Posted May 11, 2025, 2:38 AM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by subterranean View Post
Not that there haven't been a bunch of photos posted already, but I did snap a few on my way out of town last week. I posted them at the top of this photo thread.

It looks better in person than I had seen in pictures previously. Overall, I found the baggage drop and security check for Alaska to be a much more pleasant experience. The automated, round security bin stations were a super nice touch and kept things moving really smoothly. I also found the main atrium to be really pretty quiet considering how many people were moving through there, which was kind of a surprising but welcome consequence of the materials used.
It really has a nice flow. And once the project is complete, the main terminal/ticketing area will be even quieter since arriving passengers will no longer be routed through there, but through new exit lanes on the north and south sides. The current setup, although frustrating because of the long construction detours, is pretty cool because you can sit on the central bleacher seating to watch for the arriving passengers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1391  
Old Posted May 18, 2025, 4:22 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,081
Agenda for tomorrow’s PDX 2045 Planning Advisory Committee meeting: https://pdx2045.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/PDX2045_PACmtg7_Agenda.pdf
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1392  
Old Posted May 18, 2025, 5:52 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,101
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
In the immediate future, it won't. Alaska has said that they're only planning new long haul flights out of Seattle. Aside from anything else, they don't have the fleet to start adding long haul routes from their other hubs.
I assume they'd want to fly to Seattle from anywhere else they fly. They have to if the goal is to funnel people to the international routes. However maybe they don't need the fourth flight per day. Maybe it's three per day, and Portland also gets three.
__________________
"Alot" has never been a word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1393  
Old Posted May 20, 2025, 1:52 AM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,081
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
Agenda for tomorrow’s PDX 2045 Planning Advisory Committee meeting: https://pdx2045.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/PDX2045_PACmtg7_Agenda.pdf
I'm listening to the meeting at the moment. They have presented four options:
  1. Concourses C and D Expansion
  2. Concourse E Expansion
  3. Concourse E Expansion (with International Arrivals Facility)
  4. Concourse D and E Expansion[Concourse D and E Expansion

They haven't gotten into specifics as where the International Arrivals Facility (IAF) would be in any of these scenarios, and said it could be at the lower (deplaning) level or at the mezzanine level; but probably not in between at the main (enplaning) level. They also haven't gotten into specifics about how passengers would get back to the main terminal from the IAF.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1394  
Old Posted May 23, 2025, 6:44 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,081
Here's a link to the powerpoint presentation from Monday, which illustrates the options I described above.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1395  
Old Posted May 25, 2025, 4:41 AM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccoinnich View Post
Here's a link to the powerpoint presentation from Monday, which illustrates the options I described above.
Thanks for sharing! It might be easier to just expand one of the concourses, like E, and include the International Arrivals Facility in the new construction. I don’t know the details of how the current setup works, but it seems like getting rid of the bus transport for these arrivals really needs to happen. With Sea Tac saturated these days, a beautiful and efficient PDX facility could really help attract more international nonstops.

Last edited by downtownpdx; May 25, 2025 at 5:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1396  
Old Posted May 26, 2025, 6:06 PM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,101
Sea-Tac is not saturated for international flights, though it is for domestic carriers. International arrivals capacity more than doubled a few years ago (raising from 600 to 1,400 per hour iirc), and several existing gates were renovated to make them international-capable at the same time for a total of 20 international gates. I'd guess the airport can get to 10,000,000 international passengers per year with the current setup, and it'll be in the 7,000,000 range this year.
__________________
"Alot" has never been a word.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1397  
Old Posted May 27, 2025, 5:23 PM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,070
Just a note for plane spotting fans - I noticed on a short walk this morning (the nearby park offers a nice view of the PDX arrivals flight path from the east) a constant stream of about 25 planes from 9:25 to 9:35 am. I’m pretty sure only one wasn’t Alaska Airlines, so the new “banked” hub schedule was definitely on display. Fun to see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1398  
Old Posted May 27, 2025, 5:51 PM
maccoinnich maccoinnich is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,081
In good news, Icelandair is going daily next summer, and restarting service for the year in March instead of May.

In bad news, it looks like Condor won't be operating to Portland next year. In looking at the PDF of their summer 2026 timetable, Portland has disappeared along with Las Vegas, Miami, Calgary, Anchorage. And that's on top of them canceling service to Baltimore/Washington, Minneapolis, Phoenix, San Antonio, Edmonton and Halifax for summer 2025.

Hopefully the Port can secure some additional summer seasonal service for 2026, and/or work with KLM to bring back daily flights to Amsterdam.
__________________
"Maybe to an architect, they might look suspicious, but to me, they just look like rocks"

https://bsky.app/profile/maccoinnich.bsky.social
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1399  
Old Posted May 27, 2025, 6:31 PM
downtownpdx's Avatar
downtownpdx downtownpdx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,070
Good to hear about Icelandair. That’s a bummer about Condor, I hear the planes have been pretty full from PDX, but that doesn’t always translate into profits. Perhaps the recent political climate is dampening foreign travel and this is an example of the fallout.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1400  
Old Posted May 27, 2025, 7:11 PM
PhillyPDX PhillyPDX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 804
Quote:
Originally Posted by downtownpdx View Post
Just a note for plane spotting fans - I noticed on a short walk this morning (the nearby park offers a nice view of the PDX arrivals flight path from the east) a constant stream of about 25 planes from 9:25 to 9:35 am. I’m pretty sure only one wasn’t Alaska Airlines, so the new “banked” hub schedule was definitely on display. Fun to see.
Suddenly I’m scared of the banked flights with recent FAA chaos. Can we go back to staggered?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Pacific West > Portland > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.