Quote:
Originally Posted by skyhigh07
Yeah, I read on another forum this might happen. I can't recall all the details, but I think the developer was only granted the permit if they somehow made some kind concession for public art. They may now be in violation of that stipulation. I didn't think anything would come of it but it did sound kind of dicey.
|
Where did you see that? Midwood has set aside I believe 650k for the public art bonus. The muralist that did the original mural refused to work with them but the funds are still allocated towards the art bonus regardless of who makes the art.
I don't think this has anything to do with the art bonus but I guess we'll see.