View Single Post
  #1884  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2010, 5:59 PM
M1EK's Avatar
M1EK M1EK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,194
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricron View Post
As an outsider looking at Austin transportation initiatives over the last few years, the powers in charge must reach a decision over who is running transit in Austin.....

CapMetro has the tax funding mechanisms by state law. CapMetro, no matter how poorly it runs transit, should be the ones in charge. The City of Austin should get out of the transit business.

CapMetro should never had promised the city any funds from its tax revenues. CapMetro should have limited which city projects it would help finance, comtrolled the city projects scheduling, and required each city project to pass the CapMetro's board. It did make the promise, but did not limit city projects in any way, and has a contractual obligation to honor. The reality that has hit home is for each dollar the City takes makes CapMetro poorer.

I not so sure the citizens of Austin will be better off with CapMetro funding a City planned urban rail system that results in CapMetro stopping most of the bus services throughout the city.
As an outsider, you weren't here after the election in 2000 and thus have no idea why the 1/4 cent money was promised in the first place. Hint: It was a voluntary giveback to ensure that more money (1/2 cent was talked about) wasn't taken back by the freeway interests like Jim Skaggs at ROAD. The city has spent its money on transit-supportive projects, not freeways; and, frankly, has been a far better steward of those dollars over the last 8 years than has Capital Metro.
__________________
Crackplog: M1EK's Bake-Sale of Bile
Twitter: @mdahmus
Reply With Quote