View Single Post
  #45349  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2019, 8:18 PM
galleyfox galleyfox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by LouisVanDerWright View Post
They will eventually be able to do this on the Pink Line too given they only run 4 car trains on it. It's amazing how under utilized parts of our transit system is. Makes you wonder if choking off development along the Blue Line for now is actually a healthy planning choice, push that growth to the Pink and Green Lines.

That's the thing, someone just said wealthier people are more likely to use cars, that's just not true. The lowest ridership tends to be in the poorer/working class areas and the highest ridership is the wealthiest areas like the North Side Red and Brown or the NW side with the Blue Line. Meanwhile the transit running through the ultra dense Pilsen and Little Villages is basically untouched. That's generally the case in other cities as well. Turns out poor people are actually highly more likely to rely on cars to get to work because their jobs are more often decentrialized or roving (i.e. construction workers might work at dozens of different job sites during the year). This means a place like Lincoln Park or Wicker Park that is crammed to the gills with yuppies see high transit usage because they all work at professional level salaried jobs that are almost exclusively located downtown near transit.
"That's the thing, someone just said wealthier people are more likely to use cars, that's just not true. "

I didn't quite say that. I said wealthier people are more likely to take a car during off-peak hours, especially late at night to run local errands. Though it's hurting the bus routes more than the rail. At the same time, the CTA's rush hour statistics are as high as ever for the reasons you bring up. It's a difficult dynamic where the public transit systems are losing revenue but facing increased rush hour congestion.
Reply With Quote