Quote:
Originally Posted by Steely Dan
not if we don't first find a way to get some real-deal sprawl controls in place.
chicagoland wouldn't be much improved by surrounding it with yet another development ring of Mckinney's and Frisco's.
growth matters.
but the kind of growth matters more, IMO
|
I'm probably the most urbanite forumer around here. I don't even know how to drive anymore, so I'm very pro-density. But if there will be growth with sprawl, I rather have it in Chicago than in Dallas. Eventually those exurbs will provide young people to move to the city.