Quote:
Originally Posted by BrinChi
And that's why developers get away with it. The current building is in such disrepair that most people, even design-conscious individuals like those on this forum, have a difficult time imagining a renovation that cleans, restores, and builds off of what is salvageable. But it's like throwing away an antique because it's all dusty from sitting in the attic.
|
Can you explain why the building is historically relevant beyond it being old? This would be like defending the AMLI river north tower from demolition in 60 years because it's old, but even worse because the plot of land isn't being used efficiently. I know you are arguing also for facadectomy, but I find those to be in poor taste more times than not