Quote:
Originally Posted by Kngkyle
Really? It doesn't seem too bad. I was fully expecting to come across "reduce the height of all buildings to reduce shadows" or some type of crap but there was none of that. No request for more parking or reducing the number of units. It was all about improving the pedestrian experience. If anything some of the comments might lead Magellan to actually increase heights/units in order to compensate for more parkland. Apart from the one 800 footer, the other buildings were pretty short and dull. There is lots of room for improvement.
|
Is setting the buildings farther apart and creating underused park space really improving the pedestrian experience, though?