View Single Post
  #61  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2010, 5:04 PM
MR. Cosmopolitan's Avatar
MR. Cosmopolitan MR. Cosmopolitan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 144
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65MAX View Post
you're wrong about Portland not trying to create an environment suitable for public transport. That has been Metro's primary goal for a good 30 years.... to concentrate new development at town centers and along transit corridors. And yes, density HAS increased here compared to when the UGB was instituted. That was the reason for having the Urban Growth Boundary to begin with. You just haven't seen the transformation since you're new to Portland.
Prove it. Prove me that there are real city centres in Portland suburbs. Been 2 years, never seen one. In my knowledge the Portland suburbs have increased the density a lot from the 70's thanks to the urban growth boundary, but not in a way that promote's very much public transport, it was mostly filling the wide spaces between housing estates with individual houses.

Last edited by MR. Cosmopolitan; Mar 11, 2010 at 6:16 PM.
Reply With Quote