Quote:
Originally Posted by JET
That's not fair, that's not what she said. Her vote reflected her concern that staff are being inconsistent. ....
|
I don't know that it's unfair. It's definitely what was reported. She has never (to my knowledge) clarified
Quote attributed to Waye Mason in his op ed piece in the Chronicle Herald: "... said she was voting for [the proposal] necause bad development in Dartmouth had been approved and 'now it's Halifax's turn.'"
http://thechronicleherald.ca/opinion...munity-council
Described as "Revenge Vote":
https://www.halifaxjournal.com/2015/...t-development/
Not fair to protect HRM's citizens who aren't in a position to vote for her: "... city planners approved buildings that didn’t fit the guidelines in Dartmouth, [therefore] she couldn’t vote against it and face her residents."
http://m.news957.com/2015/01/14/city...t-development/
Voted out of "spite"
http://www.thecoast.ca/RealityBites/...d-out-of-spite
Bottom line - whether it was spite or because staff were "inconsistent" she felt it was a poor development and supported it anyway.