Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One
And by the way, you “correct map” is simply extremely low in zonal resolution.
|
... which is precisely why it's correct! Aren't you reading?
Quote:
|
Now the South Okanagan and Whitehorse are the same zone. (Which I am actually not going to call incorrect at this scale, I just fond it interesting that you actually know so little about forestry and ecology that you have now praised one map over another simply because it is more general.)
|
Wait, you did not understand why I'd be okay with a map that has all of Canada having the same generic climate called just "cold" (from a tropical point of view), while panning a map of Canada that has nearly all of Canada having that climate called "cold" but has an area of Southern Alberta with a different climate, that one labeled "Continental Semi-Arid"...?
Being more general - the former map - is why that map is correct / defensible.
The second climate map I'm describing is committing a capital sin - blatantly mismatched levels of detail. That's such a basic concept I can't believe I'm having to explain it.