Posted Jan 28, 2014, 2:50 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 3,883
|
|
I went through the HP comments - I cannot believe they submitted such a detailed report (but somehow I'm not surprised). They pose an interesting question regarding the heritage building Bylaw; but I don't see it as a development question (its an issue between the development permit versus building permit - two separate things).
Like most NIMBY groups - they read policies which have 'should' and 'may' to be 'must' - that's not the case. Policies are open to interpretation and really; it's always the subject of council's decision (not the heritage trust's).
|