View Single Post
  #105  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2014, 2:42 AM
aquablue aquablue is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by BBMW View Post
If you read the RPA report, the area of the bay adjacent to the airport is already a dead zone. It could probably be used. There's no wetland/habitat there. A landfill big enough to put a southside 10,000' 13-31 could be pushed through. And if you get rid of the 4-22 at LGA, that block on the northside 13-31 is removed.
Yes, I read it. I also read various rebuttals to that by environmentalists who are dead set against it.

The reason they can't take off from 31R is because of LGA, especially the expressway visual landing to runway 31 and the takeoff from runway 13 too, not just the approaches to the other runway. The LGA airspace is very close to where the 31's are. So, just eliminating the 4-22 at LGA wouldn't solve that issue I don't think.

Last edited by aquablue; Nov 17, 2014 at 3:33 AM.
Reply With Quote