Interesting fragment:
https://lop.parl.ca/sites/PublicWebs...ations/201555E
"In 1945, Canadian railways carried 55.4 million passengers, accounting for about 20% of railway revenues."
The population of Canada in 1945 was 12 million.
Sweden's population is currently 10 million and
Swedish passenger rail carries 256 million per year.
Given that Canadian passenger rail currently carries about 4.4 million passengers/year, the depth of the underperformance compared to Sweden, the most comparable European country, and historical Canada is clear: 58x and 11x.
Looking at the 2018 annual reports of
VIA and
SJ was a little weird, as a lot of the numbers were far more on par than the actual performance of the companies would imply; I assume the difference has to do with much greater federal involvement in passenger rail as a whole on the infrastructural level, beyond the main public operator.
Still, a few issues did emerge. VIA, for instance, is currently punctual on 75% of corridor services while SJ is punctual on 95%. Clearly, 75% is so low as to preclude effective use for commercial travelers.
In many senses, though, the two reports were more similar than different despite one being for a well-performing and essential piece of national infrastructure and one being for a red-headed stepchild eking out a precarious existence on the margins of life. One thing both firms emphasized was the environment and climate, which is a solid angle in this age of Greta frowning at planes.
Could our new Liberal government and its extreme climate focus spell opportunity for sad-sack VIA? I doubt it, because that would be bold and visionary rather than timid and next-to-useless, but one can hope.
The more that I look into this, though, the more I am convinced that Ottawa just doesn't have a passenger rail strategy at all.
It's a little sad given our history.