Quote:
Originally Posted by rousseau
I'm not sure if this is controversial or not, but here's what I'm thinking: The Raps could have won with Valanciunas. Gasol's crappy offence outside of the odd three-pointer and not-much-better defense (active hands, inactive feet) almost cost them the championship. Or at the very least, they won in spite of Gasol.
He only had one or two good games. There were numerous times where I was gritting my teeth and thinking that Ibaka should have had the lion's share of the playing time that Gasol had.
Does this sound like griping on the day after a championship win?
|
I absolutely disagree, but I dont have the time to type it up. Having Gasol's defense filled the last gap on this roster and was a huge reason they even made it through philly and Milwaukee.