Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123
The 465,703 with undercount is consistent with the old estimate given the old boundaries plus East Hants population. A 3% undercount would yield about 480,000.
|
Yup, I tried 2.5% which I believe is fairly typical and that yields 477,346.
It won't be long to 500,000 at all.
And that urban area number should start coming up faster, relatively, too in coming years.