Posted Jun 9, 2008, 3:49 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 1,304
|
|
I like the new version, it is spareced, but also more detailed, and the low rises, I can't emphasize enough how they make the hi rises look better.
Maybe somewhat plain, you should continue recycling your buildings with Patrick's savy suggestion of the base and top.
Mulligan is like 19.5 mb and it has about a tenth of the number of buildings of S.F.
Staunton is completely -and smartly- textured, while other cities rely on polygons for detail. Patrick do you say it's the components?
|