Posted Jan 27, 2008, 1:07 AM
|
|
Submarine de Nucléar
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 4,477
|
|
hmm. seems a bit... convenient, no? Considering that wall is around 100 or more years old.
oh well. I think if a building IS built on that block in that future, it would probably be a good thing to not have the wall. Maybe they can save the stones and incorporate them in the future (yeah right). Or at least have some sort of gesture to the previous nature of the site. Although, considering that its owned by an out of state investor, I doubt it.
|