View Single Post
Old Posted Jun 6, 2015, 9:39 PM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Originally Posted by Drybrain View Post
I don't think they're "poop"; in fact, I think it'd be too bad to lose them. But given the area and the quality of the potential replacement, I think it's an okay trade-off. To give a sense of where I draw the line, even though this looks like a really nice project, I'd oppose this if it were replacing the BMO building down the street (still anxiously awaiting those plans.)
This is my thinking too. I don't like heritage houses/buildings unnecessarily turfed. But this is a very nice looking development in a perfect location to further increase the intense density of this area. I like it.
Reply With Quote