Posted Aug 24, 2014, 8:53 PM
|
|
BANNED
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,460
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ithakas
I have a question for people more well-versed in these things – in a case where a new developer takes over a high-profile site/project like this, what prevents the new developer from pursuing the original project? Intellectual property rights? And if they did want to build the Spire, is there a way they could reimburse Kelleher for his work on this/architects' fees for the right to?
Not that I believe Related would do this, as their track record has shown them to be extremely conservative and this is a wildly ambitious project, but it seems they have the deep pockets and international marketing savvy to make this happen if they wanted to.
|
^
Quote:
Originally Posted by untitledreality
You should probably take an economics course.
|
|