It should be rescinded as it never should have been raised in the first place unless some solid evidence and numbers can be provided as to why she is deserving of the raise, instead of "she should have had it to begin with, it was a correction". Why should a chief of staff at the municipal level be making over $100k a year when we're consistently facing budget cuts and belt tightening? Why are we getting lied to and made to feel that these problems are our misunderstandings? The mayor and city employees work for us and are accountable to us, if there's any misunderstanding it is theirs to have. Any negative inference here is purely intentional.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
|