View Single Post
  #12  
Old Posted Jul 17, 2012, 5:54 PM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
"a bit taller" is right: at 85m, it'd be 1m higher than was approved for Urbandale at 99 Parkdale

Really; just 1 meter? I guess it looks like more of a difference because Urbandale's proposal "top" starts a few floors earlier (page 20 of the PDF).
The Planning Department report on 99 Parkdale said the zoning amendment was for 84m; it's probably just be a trick of the perspective and the variation in the shape of their tops.
Reply With Quote