View Single Post
Old Posted Apr 30, 2014, 7:52 AM
counterfactual counterfactual is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 1,796
Originally Posted by fenwick16 View Post reported that the appeal was voted down by a 15-1 vote. Councillor Watts was the lone supporter of the appeal.

Does Council still have to vote on whether to allow the substantive alterations to the heritage properties or is this vote also a vote to allow the alterations and proposal to proceed? Perhaps Council Waye mason could give an answer, or anyone else who knows.
Watts often raises intelligent questions and points at Council. I don't know why she has to be such an idiot when it comes to stuff like this.
Reply With Quote