Quote:
Originally Posted by eastcoastal
Interesting. My take is that the urban form was better in this iteration. LOL.
|
I had the same thought. This one is unquestionably superior architecturally, IMO (I mean, for whatever marketing-material renderings are worth). Simpler, with a lighter palate.
It also seems as if the pedestrian priority is similar to the prior incarnation along King, St. Albans, and Clifton.
As for "Clifton Green," a lot will depend on the landscaping. "King Square", agreed, is likely to end up as simply a permanent parking lot rather than a "place for events," and doesn't need any grandiose name. Just call it what it is.