[ProTram]

You all make very rational statements. I believe the point I was trying to make was that Mass Transit is very much a propeller that focuses on the "bigger picture." It focuses on the betterment of a population as a whole as opposed to harboring selfish ideals. It is for that reason that the Cap vs. Soc is presented. The Mass Transit itself is not Socialist, it is the engine behind it that possibly makes it so. Highways make a little sense but I always see more of an isolated singularity to Highways. When I say Socialism, Subsidy and Mass Transit in the same sentence, I think in the same vein as subsidized healthcare and education. Of course in todays economy, that may not be a positive thing to bring up.

You also make an excellent point about Social betterment being a by-product. I think from the viewpoint of the local government putting it in place that is absolutely TRUE, and from the viewpoint of the individuals in the community, it could be more about making their lives easier while also encouraging social stimulation and responsible planning.

Also, regarding 'Individualism,' this isn't about keeping people from cars. That is not the point. People are free to travel however they want. But if I am driving down the freeway in my car, I will be in full support of Mass Transit because I know it is helping to make the community I live in a better place. Hope that helps.