Posted Sep 9, 2014, 5:15 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 89
|
|
^
While LGA needs redevelopment ASAP. I'm glad they're looking at the bigger picture. More than just a new terminal, LGA needs a major airside rearrangement. The two crossing runway situation has to be resolved, and the Runway 4 approach interferes with the Runway 13s at JFK.
If they were smart, they'd get rid of the 4-22 runway at LGA, and build another 13-31. They could use then use the land at the 22 end of that runway as the location for the new terminal. They could also fill in the seaplane basin and extend the old 13-31 to 9,000' and build the new one to 10,000'
|