Quote:
Originally Posted by thefishingnut
Maybe it's just me, but I feel that a 1940's wood frame infill structure is a stretch to be termed historic. But even if it could be deemed historical just because of the location, all that has resulted is a boarded up, unheated building with a reported leaky roof that has probably made it beyond salvage. To me this is a failure of the heritage board, not a success. They have lost a "historic" building, not saved one.
|
It's from the
1840s. Huge difference, and I for one am
shocked that the corporate owner of a historic building would ever allow it to deteriorate until nobody cares if they demolish it.