View Single Post
  #281  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2019, 4:56 AM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin -> San Antonio -> Columbia -> San Antonio -> Chicago -> Austin -> Denver
Posts: 5,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanadvocate View Post
I said "maybe" Texas since Texas is the only state comparable to California in regards to so many large and diverse metros.
Is it?

States with 3 or more MSAs over 1 mil

California: 6
LA, Inland Empire, SF, SD, Sac, SJ (plus Fresno soon enough) I

Texas: 4
D/FW, Houston, ATX, SATX

Florida: 4
South Florida (Miami, West Palm, Ft Lauderdale), Tampa/St.Pete, Orlando, Jax

Ohio: 3
Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati

New York: 3
NYC, Buffalo, Rochester

————

Side note: the only state with a reasonable possibility with current growth rates to be added to the above list over the medium term is, oddly, South Carolina, a state that currently has zero metros over 1 mil.
__________________
HTOWN: 2305k (+10%) + MSA suburbs: 4818k (+26%) + CSA exurbs: 190k (+6%)
BIGD: 1304k (+9%) + MSA div. suburbs: 3826k (+26%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 394k (+8%)
FTW: 919k (+24%) + MSA div. suburbs: 1589k (+14%) + adj. CSA exurbs: 90k (+12%)
SATX: 1435k (+8%) + MSA suburbs: 1124k (+38%) + CSA exurbs: 18k (+11%)
ATX: 962k (+22%) + MSA suburbs: 1322k (+43%)
Reply With Quote