View Single Post
  #9  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2017, 11:57 AM
IanWatson IanWatson is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith P. View Post
The report regarding the Macara development just makes me shake my head. The public session was over a year ago and all it had were negative things. Then the staff report is page upon page of bureaucratic bafflegab that I doubt Council members even read.

What does all this cost in terms of staff time, uncertainty, and undue delay? Surely there is a better way.
The better way is to get Centre Plan passed. Then these things can be done as-of-right or with streamlined design review like they are downtown.

When you go through a planning application--any development agreement or rezoning--that bureaucratic bafflegab is absolutely necessary. These are legal processes and open to appeal to the UARB. That detailed analysis is necessary to defend against appeals.
Reply With Quote