Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad
Not sure about the fine part, perhaps a sternly worded note would do, but I agree completely with everything else that you have said. The developer should definitely be ordered to restore the sign.  |
I suggested a fine due to the contempt that the developer appears to be showing to the historic nature of the sign, as quoted in the previous post by eastcoastal.
Im sure he figured that he'd whitewash the sign and in a few weeks when the furor died down, he'd re-brand the building as he saw fit. That type of thinking should be punished, and a fine would work to change it. Maybe even a "donation" to the Historic Society would suffice.