Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRitsman
I had thought that Knightstone was an investor of sorts, I'm pretty sure in some way McMaster owns the property otherwise there wouldn't be grounds to avoid property taxes and development charges which I believe this development was exempted from if I recall correctly.
I may be wrong though.
Sidenote: did anyone confirm whether McMaster did in fact buy the parking lot west of Bay St N just north of King?
|
Hmm, perhaps McMaster owns it and leased the lands to Knightstone for the building. I'd love to confirm the ownership structure here.