View Single Post
  #28  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2022, 1:01 AM
lachlanholmes's Avatar
lachlanholmes lachlanholmes is offline
Forever forward.
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 878
This is embarrassingly bad in concept and I bet will be agonizingly bad in execution. A site with great potential, completely squandered by utterly dreadful architecture — absolutely shameful, no way around it.



I measured some of the balconies. Not only are the triangle balconies useless, a lot of the others are hardly any better:







I will, for posterity's sake if for no other reason, bring forward these elevation and two more renders of the "heritage retention" component:

North Elevation


South Elevation


East Elevation


West Elevation


Heritage Retention Elevation


Heritage Retention Rendering




Finally, bringing forward a table from the planning response document. A proposal that has been with the City for exactly two years and one day (during a housing crisis) that has seen the density cut and cut and cut, the overall units cut, and the unit breakdown skew increasingly towards smaller units:





I do believe in credit where credit is due, though, and on this project it's due in two places:

- the number of parking stalls decreased from 234 to 139 (excellent!); and

- the commercial space proposed is a bright spot with five separate spaces that are sized well.
Reply With Quote