View Single Post
  #3186  
Old Posted Nov 13, 2021, 5:27 AM
SIGSEGV's Avatar
SIGSEGV SIGSEGV is offline
look at us still talking
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Loop, Chicago
Posts: 6,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ The City seems to be more interested in extracting money from taxpayers via red light cameras, which make $$, than facial recognition cameras which might put people in jail that Kim Foxx is trying with her heart & soul to bring to justice but, sigh.....if only there were some evidence!
They have arrested suspect, based on surveillance camera / license plate reader evidence. The suspect was 18 and had no criminal history (though according to the Tribune was wanted on a warrant?)


https://chicago.suntimes.com/2021/11...chicago-police
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...5wq-story.html

What I don't understand is this:
- If the stolen car got picked up by license plate readers, this was undoubtedly not the first time. Does CPD not bother to use the license plate readers to catch stolen cars? It seems like it wouldn't be THAT hard (though it requires sufficient license plate reader density, I suppose).
- The robber/murderer made $100 off this robbery/murder. Armed robbery doesn't seem very profitable...
- Should the electronics store be under investigation? They must know when something like this is stolen, no?
__________________
And here the air that I breathe isn't dead.

All you need is a modest house in a modest neighborhood, in a modest town where honest people dwell.
Reply With Quote