Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
Interestingly, the report says they're not maxing out the total density available (14.3 FSR - they're proposing 11.6) or height. "While the applicant is providing the full 20% inclusionary requirement, they are not taking the full offset due to the building's proposed height efficiency that is, taking the full offset would result in a taller building than the site can efficiently accommodate."
|
Good catch.
I'm looking at New York's skinny skyscrapers and wondering what other "factors" are influencing those conclusions
.