Quote:
Originally Posted by Engibeer
On the bright side, it looks like they are now evaluating more of a 'direct connection' approach in terms of tying into Pitts/Gould's bypass. I have to say, this is a much better idea for traffic flow..even if it takes another ten years to complete.
|
Financing aside one would think this section wouldn't take as long to build as the previous section.
The previous section required a shit tonne of blasting and what like (5?) overpasses. This section is pretty much a highway across farmland and from what it looks like only two(maybe just the one now?)overpass/interchanges.