Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban_Sky
What about “Civil disobedience” or “peaceful (though illegal) protest”? Acting against the law and ignoring court orders does not satisfy any definition of “violence” or even “terrorism”, but you have already abundantly demonstrated in your little train wreck thread that you are completely immune against acknowledging any definitions of the terms you use so grotesquely inappropriately. You may now go into a different forum and spew your hatred there... |
Well come up with a better term.
This is a disruption of a billion dollar piece of Canada's infrastructure.
"civil disobedience" seems highly inappropriate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban_Sky
demonstrated in your little train wreck thread[/URL] that you are completely immune against acknowledging any definitions of the terms you use so grotesquely inappropriately. You may now go into a different forum and spew your hatred there...
|
Not sure it was a train wreck seems quite clear to me that people panic because I'm unleashing the elephant in the room.
You have a group of people who are sabotaging Canadian infrastructure.
The kind of infrastructure that is suppose to fight climate change.
This pretty much nullifies the notion that this has anything to do with climate change.
So what are we left with.
People want to attack working class Albertans.
And they do so by putting people in my status category as exempt from the law.
So not only is this is a war on the working class, your setting a precedent that the rule of law does not stand on people with status.
This is like 15 different variants of wrong, I can't be surprised.
If this isn't an example of extreme leftist values I don't know what is.
It's an attack on the working class, the environment, and it devalues the ability of aboriginal peoples to be seen as equal.
And the response I get is that "it's complicated" or that I'm full of hate.
The reality is this brand of politics is supported by people who literally do not value logic. Not to say these people aren't rational, but rationality and logic are not the same thing.
If your rationality is so incapable of seeing very basic truths.
I.e. all people are equal, some people being more equal than others doesn't relate to logic.
I.e. we're gonna attack a pipeline which will has almost no affect on global energy consumption in order "save the environment".
In the process the direct benefactors of this policies are government in Eurasia/Middle who treat women like 2x cows, hate gays and are blatantly antisemitic.
This is the definition of thinking that is a product of rationality without the usage of logic.
It all makes sense if you aren't prioritizing your values by logical connectives but it is a deck of cards.